Which method is least effective for developing critical thinking in learners?

The method of lecturing is typically least effective for developing critical thinking in learners because it primarily relies on the transfer of information from the instructor to the students without promoting active engagement. In a lecture format, the instructor usually presents content in a unidirectional manner, limiting opportunities for students to analyze, evaluate, or synthesize information.

Conversely, methods such as case studies, group projects, and simulations encourage interactive participation and hands-on learning. These methods require learners to apply concepts, collaborate with peers, and tackle real-world scenarios, all of which are essential components of critical thinking. Case studies prompt learners to assess complex situations, group projects foster discussion and idea exchange, and simulations create immersive experiences where learners must make decisions and solve problems in realistic contexts. These approaches actively engage students, prompting them to think critically as they navigate through challenges and develop their reasoning skills.